Childhood Obesity: Legislating Healthy Food

Stop making sugar based drinks available to children, and children experience less obesity.  That was the conclusion of the study detailing 6,300 students in 40 states who were followed from grades fifth through eighth.

The term “competitive foods” is used to describe the foods sold outside of the federal meal programs, typically foods that are found in vending machines. Many school districts have used income from vending machines to help fund school activities, but the foods are at cross purposes with healthy nutrition.  Some states have passed laws restricting the availability of those items in schools.  It appears, from this study that these laws have an effect.

Comparing their height, weight, and the food laws in the states found that when states passed strict laws regulating food and beverages five percent fewer students remained overweight, and eight percent fewer remain obese in the eighth grade than did states that did not enforce strict laws.

To translate the data: kids who are five foot tall gained 2 pounds more if they lived in a state that had no regulation of sugar filled drinks and snacks. States who passed laws that were effective had specific requirements that snacks have limited sugar and fat. Ineffective laws had no guidelines, and snacks available in those states still would be considered high in sugar. Currently, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) does place minimal limits only on the availability of foods of minimal nutritional value (FMNV) in food service areas during meal times. The Federal regulations allow states and local school districts to adopt stricter policies on access to competitive foods.

Some States limit access to all competitive foods, while others only limit access to FMNV, and others only limit access to soft drinks. Some laws apply to all schools, k-12, while other states only apply the laws from K-8.  Some States prohibit specific channels of distribution or outlets for competitive items (e.g., vending machines or à la  carte sales). Alabama prohibits sales of FMNV in all locations during meal service; New Jersey does not allow sales of FMNV on campus until the end of the last lunch period.

Since 20 percent of the elementary school children nationwide are considered obese, this small impact is important. In states without competitive food laws 37 percent of the fifth graders were overweight and 21 percent were obese. Contrast that with states that developed strict laws, where 39 percent of the fifth graders were overweight when the study began and dropped to 34% by eighth grade. The 21% of fifth graders who were obese in those states dropped to 18 percent.

This data is not conclusive, but does point out that if we eliminate one source of unhealthy foods from schools there is less obesity. This in spite of students being able to get unhealthy food when not in school.  Should we regulate food sources for minors? It might just be necessary.

That reminds me: why do hospitals have junk food?

It is clear from our patients who have weight loss surgery: those who do not keep junk foods in their homes do better than those who allow them. Perhaps it is time to make our K-12 schools free from junk food.

Keeping Vending Machines off school grounds is an effective way to reduce obesity

REFERENCES:

Online from Pediatrics please click here.

Dr. Terry Simpson About Dr. Terry Simpson
Dr. Terry Simpson received his undergraduate and graduate degrees from the University of Chicago where he spent several years in the Kovler Viral Oncology laboratories doing genetic engineering. He found he liked people more than petri dishes, and went to medical school. Dr. Simpson, a weight loss surgeon is an advocate of culinary medicine. The first surgeon to become certified in Culinary Medicine, he believes teaching people to improve their health through their food and in their kitchen. On the other side of the world, he has been a leading advocate of changing health care to make it more "relationship based," and his efforts awarded his team the Malcolm Baldrige award for healthcare in 2011 for the NUKA system of care in Alaska and in 2013 Dr Simpson won the National Indian Health Board Area Impact Award. A frequent contributor to media outlets discussing health related topics and advances in medicine, he is also a proud dad, husband, author, cook, and surgeon “in that order.” For media inquiries, please visit www.terrysimpson.com.

Share this article on social media!

Latest Comments

  1. Childhood obesity: legislating healthy food | Your Doctor's Orders | Food News Gator
    [...] from: Childhood obesity: legislating healthy food | Your Doctor's Orders This entry was posted in Healthy Food and tagged epidemic, foods, junk, limit, make, obese, [...]

  2. Lynn says:

    Someone will have to define what “junk” food is since at Rite Aid, your wellness card will buy lots of junk food. Schools might have to go a step farther and prohibit the junk from being brought from home in lunch boxes and at celebrations and class birthday parties. Then we have to deal with the fact that was once the “freshman 15” is not the “freshman 25” but by then the child is too old to be told what not to eat. There is also lots of empty calorie food, such as popcorn and fruit roll-ups, that may be considered by some people to be healthy. In the grey area are pre-packaged cereals, some of which are also empty calories.

  3. thedoc says:

    That is why the laws in the states are diverse. Some are very specific and others are not. Not surprising, the more strict the laws are regarding junk food, the more defined with little wiggle room, the less obesity.

  4. Zoey says:

    When my child is with me, I can make healthy food choices for her. At the age of 10, I expect, left to her own vices, with a couple of dollars in her pocket, her lunch time would consist of Doritos and cookies. I can only hope that, with support from home, the educators are guiding my child to learn and develop. I don’t give them the same credit for making healthy menu choices for her, as school districts tend to purchase food that is easy and quick to prepare, and easy to distribute in mass quantities. I circumvent this by packing lunch from home. Many children rely on free lunch programs in order to have lunch at school. While food programs are progressing towards more healthy choices, that are lower in sugar and calories, vending machines provide way too much temptation, and leaves the choices up to kids. I’d rather make a donation to my child’s school, than have the school rely on monies from vending machines. The study illustrates the positive impact on kid’s health, when campuses are forced to regulate the kid’s food choices. I am not one that usually encourages more government regulation, but in this case, I’m supportive.

Leave a Reply